API-based video editing compared
See how FFmpeg Micro stacks up against self-hosted FFmpeg, Rendi, template video APIs, and video platforms when you are automating video from n8n, Make.com, or Zapier.
Who FFmpeg Micro is for
- • Automation specialists building workflows in n8n, Make.com, or Zapier
- • Agencies and content creators batch processing client videos
- • Marketing teams clipping long-form content into social-ready posts
- • Solo founders who want to scale content without becoming DevOps engineers
Who should look at other options
- • Teams that mainly need video hosting, players, and analytics for end users (Mux, api.video, Cloudflare Stream)
- • Companies that need full DAM for all images and videos (Cloudinary)
- • Broadcast or OTT platforms that require very specific standards and SLAs (Bitmovin, AWS MediaConvert with a dedicated video infra team)
How to run FFmpeg for automation workflows
If you want FFmpeg-style operations driven by automation tools, here are your real alternatives. These solutions give you direct control over video editing and transcoding, not just template generation or hosting.
Looking specifically at Rendi? Read the full FFmpeg Micro vs Rendi comparison.
| Service | Pricing Model | 10k min/month | 60k min/month | Setup Complexity | Works with n8n/Make/Zapier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFmpeg Micro | Input minutes per plan | $89 | $349 | Low | Yes |
| Self-hosted FFmpeg | EC2 + S3 + CloudFront | ~$94 | ~$301 | High | DIY |
| Rendi | GB-based processing | ~$100+ | ~$400+ | Medium | Partial |
| AWS MediaConvert | Per output minute | ~$150 | ~$900 | High | DIY |
FFmpeg Micro is fully managed, automation-ready, and priced by input minutes. No DevOps required.
Self-hosted is cheaper only at very high volume and requires DevOps expertise, monitoring, and ongoing maintenance.
Rendi uses GB-based processing and is similar in spirit, but uses file size rather than minute pricing.
MediaConvert is powerful but complex and AWS-centric, requiring deep infrastructure knowledge.
Template-based video generation
These tools are designed for creating templated videos from designs and data. They excel at generating branded marketing videos, product showcases, and social content from templates, not raw FFmpeg control.
| Service | Main Focus | Pricing Style | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| FFmpeg Micro | FFmpeg automation | Minutes | Editing existing content at scale |
| Creatomate | Templates | Credits | Branded social video templates |
| JSON2Video | Templates | Credits/minutes | JSON-driven video generation |
Use Creatomate or JSON2Video if you primarily need templated marketing or product videos with visual design tools.
Use FFmpeg Micro if you already have content and need to automate editing and transcoding across many channels via n8n or Make.
Full video platforms
These are not direct competitors, but people often compare them. They provide end-to-end video solutions with hosting, players, and analytics, which FFmpeg Micro does not include.
| Service | What They Include | 10k min/month | Do You Still Need FFmpeg? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mux / api.video / Cloudflare Stream | Hosting, player, analytics | ~$32–60 | Only for advanced editing |
| FFmpeg Micro | FFmpeg processing only | $89 | No - this is FFmpeg |
Choose Mux/api.video/Cloudflare Stream if you want an end-user-facing video platform with players and analytics.
Combine them with FFmpeg Micro if you want deep editing plus great hosting.
FFmpeg Micro alone is ideal if your app or automation already handles hosting or just needs files back.
Self-Hosting Cost Analysis
Self-hosting FFmpeg on AWS or GCP looks cheap on paper, but once you add developer time it only beats FFmpeg Micro at very high, steady volumes. Here's a simplified breakdown:
| Usage per month | Approx infra cost per month | Estimated engineering time per month | Total effective cost per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 min | ~$57 | 3+ hours (~$240+) | ~$297+ |
| 10,000 min | ~$94 | 3+ hours (~$240+) | ~$334+ |
| 60,000 min | ~$301 | 3+ hours (~$240+) | ~$541+ |
Show detailed cost assumptions
Infrastructure Assumptions
- Single c7g.large instance (2 vCPU, Graviton) at ~$0.0725/hour in us-east-1 (~$53/month if 24x7)
- S3 Standard storage at $0.023 per GB/month
- Data transfer out at ~$0.09 per GB for first 10 TB
- Average encoded video bitrate: 5 Mbps at HD (1 minute ≈ 37.5 MB)
Engineering Assumptions
- 10 hours initial setup (Docker, CI/CD, health checks, pipelines, logging)
- 3 hours per month ongoing maintenance (monitoring, patches, upgrades, incidents)
- Developer cost: $80/hour (example rate)
What's Not Included
- Load balancing, monitoring, or autoscaling
- Multi-region redundancy
- Backups or snapshots
- Separate staging environment
| Usage | Output data | S3 storage | Egress | EC2 | Total infra |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 min | ~36.6 GB | ~$0.84 | ~$3.29 | ~$53 | ~$57 |
| 10,000 min | ~366 GB | ~$8.42 | ~$33 | ~$53 | ~$94 |
| 60,000 min | ~2,197 GB | ~$50.54 | ~$198 | ~$53 | ~$301 |
| 200,000 min | ~7,324 GB | ~$168.46 | ~$659 | ~$53 | ~$880 |
When Does Self-Hosting Make Financial Sense?
You can think of the choice like this:
- Every month you pay for servers and bandwidth.
- You also pay (in money or your own time) for someone to keep that FFmpeg setup healthy.
- Self-hosting only wins if those two costs together stay below what you would pay for FFmpeg Micro.
For most teams that are not running massive volumes, the extra engineering time wipes out the theoretical savings. At 60k minutes: FFmpeg Micro costs $349/month. Self-hosted infra is ~$301, leaving only $48/month for engineering time. That's less than 0.6 hours at $80/hour—not realistic once you account for incidents, upgrades, and changes.
Scenarios by Business Size
FFmpeg Micro
$19
Self-hosted
~$297+
AWS MediaConvert
~$15
If you are here and live in n8n or Make, FFmpeg Micro is the least painful option.
FFmpeg Micro
$89
Self-hosted
~$334+
Mux (if hosting needed)
~$32
If you are here and live in n8n or Make, FFmpeg Micro is the least painful option.
FFmpeg Micro
$349
Self-hosted
~$541+
Mux (if hosting needed)
~$192
If you are here and live in n8n or Make, FFmpeg Micro is the least painful option.
Enterprise (200k+ minutes/month)
At this scale, talk to us for Enterprise pricing and, if you have a dedicated video infra team, self-hosting might also start to make sense.
When to Choose FFmpeg Micro
- • Your automation lives in n8n, Make.com, or Zapier
- • You want to automate editing, not manage servers
- • You need predictable per-minute pricing without DevOps
- • You need end-user-facing players and analytics
- • You want hosting with repeated viewing
- • Your main problem is video distribution, not editing
- • You have massive scale (200k+ minutes/month)
- • You have an infra team in-house
- • You're happy to own incidents and maintenance
Ready to stop babysitting FFmpeg servers?
Start your free FFmpeg Micro account, connect it to n8n or Make, and run your first automated video job in under 10 minutes.
Start free - No credit card requiredPricing numbers are based on publicly available pricing as of late 2025 and simplified around HD VOD usage. Always check vendor sites for exact current pricing.